over 15,000 bikers rode threw paris on a protest , info on youtube

"Through" ;)
"Thru" is also deemed acceptable in some cases... as in "Fast-Food Drive-Thru"

http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/1003/the-original-grammar-nazi-grammar-nazi-day-poster-demotivational-poster-1267771376.jpg

"Through" ;)
"Thru" is also deemed acceptable in some cases... as in "Fast-Food Drive-Thru"

It would be through, not "through". Likewise with "thru". However, the assertion that the two forms are interchangeable is flawed, since "thru" is a fragment of the colloquial drive-thru and thus should not "stand alone" as a preposition. Furthermore, the use of an ellipsis in the sentence is incorrect; a comma would have been the appropriate punctuation.

it would be through, not "through". Likewise with "thru". However, the assertion that the two forms are interchangeable is flawed, since "thru" is a fragment of the colloquial drive-thru and thus should not "stand alone" as a preposition. Furthermore, the use of an ellipsis in the sentence is incorrect; a comma would have been the appropriate punctuation.
6072
6073

Edit again: I just watched the Batman: Arkham Asylum sequel teaser trailer (http://www.arkhamhasmoved.com/us/) and noticed a "NO THRU ROAD" sign on the gates at the very beginning. "NO THRU TRAFFIC" is much more common though.

over 15,000 bikers rode threw paris on a protest , info on youtube

This comment was taken out of context. There should have been a comma after rode.

...over 15,000 bikers rode, threw paris on a protest,

paris should also have a capital "P". Thence, ...over 15,000 bikers rode, threw Paris on a protest.

I also think it should be, " this threw Paris into a protest".

Now that Paris has been thrown on (or into) a protest, I ask, "was this about cheese, wine, or some other important French per-dick-a-ment"?

Maybe it was supposed to read, "over 15,000 biker road, this threw Paris into a protest". Was the road not big enough? Was the road only for bikers?

There really isn't enough information!

I have searched youboob and not found any such protest.

6072
6073

It is still modifying a noun and not being used as a preposition.:focus: I yield

sorry i was in a rush

It would be through, not "through". Likewise with "thru". However, the assertion that the two forms are interchangeable is flawed, since "thru" is a fragment of the colloquial drive-thru and thus should not "stand alone" as a preposition. Furthermore, the use of an ellipsis in the sentence is incorrect; a comma would have been the appropriate punctuation.

I now know more about grammer then I ever wanted to know. Hey let me look up an appropriate joke and post it here.

Here ya go. Even with spell checker you can still mess up.

Dew knot trussed yore spell chequer two fined awl yore mistakes - Brendon Hills

i think you meant grammar and not grammer, right snake...sorry i just had to do it

i hope i don't get any nightmare about french grammar, french high school was a nightmare in itself.

(thought i'd put something linked to france in here since that's what the topic was original about)

:focus:
I looked for it on youtube but could not find it. Could you post a link to to it ninja man? Would realy appreciate it.

:focus:
I looked for it on youtube but could not find it. Could you post a link to to it ninja man? Would realy appreciate it.

It has been found! (http://www.ninjette.org/forums/showthread.php?t=39944) We should probably move the on-topic discussion there.

That leaves us with an on-going off-topic conversation to continue. :)

It is still modifying a noun and not being used as a preposition.:focus: I yield

Luckily, I only said that it "is also deemed acceptable in some cases." Those cases were where a shortened version is required, like on space-limited signs, forms, and road markings. In fact, I was specifically thinking of markings I've seen actually painted on the road when I said that but I mentioned fast-food because it's nearly universally applied there.

Let it go.

Let it go.

It's a joke.