I don't believe there is a clear best answer here, other than "it depends". If the shifting was instantaneous, a 100+ gear transmission would be awesome, keeping the bike within a few dozen rpms of the power peak and accelerating the bike as quickly as possible. Theoretically that means a CVT would be optimal, but there is so much drag and loss in one that it negates any advantage. But if the shifting time took 8 minutes per shift, the best transmission would have 1 gear, and dealing with the bike running so far away from its power band for so long would still be faster than a single shift to make it better.
So everything in between is a compromise/optimization problem. The right amount of gear changes and how much it slows/speeds up acceleration compared to optimal depends on that shift speed, and also how much the engine power varies as it gets farther above and below its power peak.
|