Quote:
Originally Posted by Too40gawlf
If members of the riot where starting to use deadly force then yes, their victims should have been able to reciprocate. Take this theoretical example, lets say a mob walk up to your front gate and the leader declares he is going to set fire to your house with your family inside. Do you have a right to shoot him dead and anyone else that is holding a torch?
|
As soon as they enter your property line to carry out their threats then yes.
However, your twisting the story.
When you put on a uniform and ride a motorcycle directly at a group of thousands of people who are obviously pissed, its your own damn fault. He essentially "approached their gates".
Hmmm should I walk into the lions mouth?
Or **** those are some sharp teeth maybe I shouldnt.
p.s. Alex, Im American and look, I can manage to not advocate the killing of everything that goes against my views.
Scumbags make the rest of the world hate us
And yes, I still find the OP's photo funny. Yes, I am "Chortling" at his stupidity which lead to his misfortune.
The guy took a Molotov to the head and walked away fine, whats there to be angry about? He has a story for his kids.