View Single Post
Old September 6th, 2017, 03:48 PM   #52
DannoXYZ
ninjette.org certified postwhore
 
Name: AKA JacRyann
Location: Mesa, AZ
Join Date: Dec 2011

Motorcycle(s): CB125T CBR250R-MC19 CBR250RR-MC22 NSR350R-MC21 VF500F CBR600RR SFV650 VFR750F R1M ST1300PA Valkyrie-F6C

Posts: A lot.
MOTY - 2018, MOTM - Nov '17
Quote:
Originally Posted by ducatiman View Post
yet stock jetted/exhaust 250's are reported to routinely yield + 50 MPG consumption and maverick reported 40 earlier in the thread.

What MPG your street bike getting, JacRyan? You've accurately set the pilot screws?

I realize your racebike MPG is impertinent, but no doubt you've got Dynojet needles in there too?
On the street bike, I get about 225-240 miles per tank, not sure what that is in MPG. Race bike gets 5x 20-minutes sessions per tank... about 130-miles.

Pilot-screws are 2.75-turns out on both bikes where they're most responsive. More or less and they tend to be more rubbery.

Earlier plug-comparison was back-to-back sessions at Thunderhill several months ago. Both bikes went 20-minutes on East course with ~90% of that time at WOT between 9000-13000rpms. Not sure I can get more identical operating conditions than that.

Stock bike spent all its time in the super-rich top-end zone (1st dyno-chart above). Without any flow-increasing mods, it was even richer than the 12.0:1 AFR recorded on that chart, probably in the 10.0-11.0:1 range. Plugs would seem to show that, if not even richer.

I looked in Dyno-jet kit box and Stg-2 needles with 3-grooves for circlips are still in there. So I've got stock needles in race-bike with no washers.

Gonna hook up the wideband and see how my AFR really compares to those charts above.
DannoXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote