View Single Post
Old May 5th, 2010, 09:23 PM   #48
CZroe
CPT Falcon
 
CZroe's Avatar
 
Name: J.Emmett Turner
Location: Newnan, GA
Join Date: Apr 2009

Motorcycle(s): '08 CP Blue EX250J, '97 unpainted EX250F, 2nd '97 unpainted EX250F (no engine), '07 black EX250F

Posts: A lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samer View Post
The nuclear material is negligible. You don't need that much nuclear material to produce a heck of a lot of energy. Hence, there are nuclear subs that can run for quite some time...
The mount of useful material is a negligible size but do you have any idea how much mining it takes to get enough to start a reactor? They had to build a city to do it in WWII.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samer View Post
"Oil factoring in..." I have no clue what you mean. The efficiency of a gasoline engine only, just the engine is on the order of 25%. This doesn't take into account the amount of energy it takes to get to crude oil, transport the crude oil, refine the oil, then transport the gasoline to your local gas station.
I responded as if you were talking about energy transfer lost in the engine due to oil not being 100% efficient (0 friction).
CZroe is offline   Reply With Quote