View Single Post
Old April 17th, 2013, 11:34 AM   #18
Lychee
sail away
 
Lychee's Avatar
 
Name: Jon
Location: San Jose
Join Date: Jul 2012

Motorcycle(s): gixxer (sold), ninjette (upgrade!)

Posts: 964
Blog Entries: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by old3 View Post
I disagree, the stock damper holes are a poor form of damping and they offered nearly zero on slow speed compression. Now it hits the valve and is correctly damped. I don't think I rode a single mile without bottoming the forks stock, and nearly every time I stopped hard they were blown thru.

If I require more flow to the valves, I can drill any combo of holes I want.

In high speed damping, I believe they were packing, or basically locking up as they couldn't flow enough as they moved so much on every strike. Now they stay up higher and I haven't had them stutter yet, but again, the road temps are only up to 50f at best right now so I'm not slamming the corners where I had this issue quite as hard.

Jim,
Politely and with respect- The difference in damping quality at different speeds serves to support the original suggestion that you have paid $170 dollars for an effect you could have achieved with $5 of higher viscosity fork oil or a smaller air gap. The whole point of the valve emulator is to allow optimal flow at BOTH slow and fast speeds. How much damping is the job of oil viscosity.
__________________________________________________
Unregistered found this post helpful.
Track Day Preparation Checklist
1. Financial 2. Mental 3. Physical 4. Gear / Bike
Lychee is offline   Reply With Quote


1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.