Quote:
Originally Posted by alex.s
excuse my language but that's a load of ****. all it takes is one ****ing idiot doing something that someone else can't compensate enough for. you can do everything perfectly, be the best driver in the world, and still have some **** nut ruin your day/life. all it takes is one piece of **** making a mistake
|
So you've
never had to take evasive maneuvers to avoid an idiot move by someone else? Luckily you never will have to because you're gonna die for sure!!! Because
nothing you can do is gonna make difference right?
Let's change this all-or-nothing, black/white qualitative assertion to quantitative analysis. Bell-curve average is NOT same result for everyone. If it was, we'd all be dead because we've all drunk water at one point or another in our lives and
some people have choked on it and died!
1. statistically, 67% of motorcycle traffic accidents are caused by autos turning left in front of biker. How many of these incidents results in no collision due to biker's skill in avoidance moves vs. how many results in collision? That's data I'd like to see. I would assert that
in vast majority of these cases, no collisions occur due to the biker's evasive maneuvers.
2. in remaining cases that DO result in collision, vast majority of them shows
LONG skidding tyre-mark from bike up to collision point.
You have to separate
fault from
contribution. It's not one and the same.