ninjette.org - View Single Post

DannoXYZ · May 28th, 2019, 04:15 PM

You should also get ignition-module for PCV

Ok, with 59hp target... ((59/39)-1)*14.5 = 7.4 psi boost with adiabatic compression. Since that does not exist, I recommend an intercooler.

Very good with your fuel-calculations! I think injector flow is:

EAT-811 = 175cc/min @ 43psi
INP-288 = 200cc/min @ 43psi (2008 ZX-6R)
INP-250 = 235cc/min @ 43psi (2003-04 R6)

One problem with larger injectors is minimum pulse-width at idle. Using factory computer and PCV means you cannot program actual pulse-width at idle. The PCV alters factory MAP-sensor output into smaller value and tricks factory computer into into thinking airflow is different than real. But... ECU still uses factory 3D-map and at smallest idle data-cell, pulse-width will still be same. You may end up with stumbling unstable idle.

Better solution is to re-program/re-flash factory ECU and actually change the value stored in idle data-cell rather than trying to shift it into lower-load area.

May 28th, 2019, 04:15 PM	#15
DannoXYZ ninjette.org certified postwhore Name: AKA JacRyann Location: Mesa, AZ Join Date: Dec 2011 Motorcycle(s): CB125T CBR250R-MC19 CBR250RR-MC22 NSR350R-MC21 VF500F CBR600RR SFV650 VFR750F R1M ST1300PA Valkyrie-F6C Posts: A lot. MOTY - 2018, MOTM - Nov '17	You should also get ignition-module for PCV Ok, with 59hp target... ((59/39)-1)14.5 = 7.4 psi boost with adiabatic compression. Since that does not exist, I recommend an intercooler. Very good with your fuel-calculations! I think injector flow is: EAT-811 = 175cc/min @ 43psi INP-288 = 200cc/min @ 43psi (2008 ZX-6R) INP-250 = 235cc/min @ 43psi (2003-04 R6) One problem with larger injectors is minimum pulse-width at idle. Using factory computer and PCV means you cannot program actual pulse-width at idle. The PCV alters factory MAP-sensor output into smaller value and tricks factory computer into into thinking airflow is different than real. But... ECU still uses factory 3D-map and at smallest idle data-cell, pulse-width will still be same. You may end up with stumbling unstable idle. Better solution is to re-program/re-flash factory ECU and actually change* the value stored in idle data-cell rather than trying to shift it into lower-load area.