Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex
It's a bit misleading for them to leave that article posted up there, and remove any date for when it was relevant. It's almost 10 years old at this point, is specifically critical of the Snell M2010 standard, which has been superceded for years. it shouldn't be used at this point to identify the safest helmets, and its conclusions may or may not have much merit compared to the current standards (either US, Europe, or Asia).
|
I agree completely, I didn't notice that the article wasn't dated, it was originally published in the June 2005 magazine. And because the helmet manufacturers are always coming out with new lids to meet new specs, is the reason I'd like to see a label showing test results, or at least a pamphlet in the box with new helmets showing the results.