[motorcycle.com] - Midsize Post-Modern Cruiser Shootout: Harley-Davidson Street 750 v

[Ninjette Newsbot]

Kawasaki’s new Vulcan S forced us to ride these motorcycles again, and now we’re glad we did. Harley’s Street 750 and the new Vulcan are within 10 pounds, 1 horsepower and 400 dollars of each other. And the different-but-still-growing-on-us Honda CTX700N belongs in the mix as well. For the kind of riding most of us actually do most of the time, 700 or so cubic centimeters for around $7k seems like a pretty good place to be. Blatting around town, that is, in pursuit of one of MO’s secondary missions (keep Starbucks afloat), with the occasional blast out into the hinterlands to sniff the wildflowers – courtesy of the recent merciful rains here in SoCal – and ride like MOrons a little.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

For the Harley-Davidson Street 750 however, there is precious little mercy. Or is there? How nice that the bike here most in need of aftermarket support has the most available. Mainly, we’re still puzzled how even the great and powerful H-D could release a modern motorcycle with such a useless front brake. More than once I had to add a third finger to the front lever to keep myself from rolling downhill while stopped at the side of the road. Tom Roderick claims he almost ran into the back of a truck the first time he rode the Street; Troy Siahaan wants to know how he’s supposed to trail brake when there is no brake? There’s a lot of value in the switch to the SBS brake pads we tested on a Street 750 last year. Even better, probably, would be this four-piston Brembo kit from Italy. Cara mia!

There are two Starbucks at our favorite traffic circle; we like to pilfer sugar from both of them. T. Roderick worries about deep vein thrombosis riding around with his knees higher than his hipbones.


Luckily, it’s pretty easy to lock up the rear, so maybe H-D just sees the Street’s front/rear braking bias as a way to get people interested in flat-tracking again? (The Marketing Dept. really needs to get on board here: HBS, “Heritage Braking System.”)

We won’t go into the exposed wiring, crude welds and junk-drawer fasteners again. The Street is what it is. Many Harleys throughout the years have stressed owner involvement, and a little bit on the part of the proud new Street owner will go a long way. It’s a little sad, though, that the stylists didn’t just extend things like the bike’s plastic sidecovers to hide a few more of its privates (like Honda and Kawasaki did). Anyway, job one is that front brake.

The Michelin tires are nice, though.


Once that’s fixed, things are looking up. Even Troy S. likes its 750cc V-Twin: “The engine is the highlight of the bike; it likes to rev, makes decent torque and has that V-Twin character the others lack with their parallel-Twins.”

The Street’s V-Twin is 104cc bigger than the Kawasaki’s parallel unit, and likes to rev maybe even a bit more freely up to its 8000-rpm redline. The Kawi can rev on to 9500, but the Street uses its extra displacement to make its 43.5 lb-ft of torque (practically equal to the Kawi) lower in the powerband. In a drag race, there’s not much between them (except the Street’s clutch feels less abusable), which isn’t something we’ve ever been able to say vis a vis Harley vs. Kawasaki before. The six-speed gearbox isn’t the best or the worst (okay, on our ScoreCard it’s the worst of these three), but it gets the job done: Nobody complained about false neutrals, hard shifting or missed shifts.

Engines go about their business in different ways. The Honda gets its work one early with a diesel-like powerband, which is diametrically opposed to the Vulcan’s revvy power unit. The Harley takes the middle ground, delivering greater low-end power than the Vulcan but coming up a bit short up top. Dynojet courtesy of MotoGPWerks, Anaheim, CA.


The Street also finished last in the Handling category, with both of my co-testers using the word truckish to describe its steering. Personally, I don’t feel it. The Street has right around 4.5 inches of trail just like the other two here, a shorter wheelbase than the Vulcan and skinnier tires than either of them, but it does have the laziest rake at 32.0 degrees. We wonder if the strange-profiled (kind of flat-looking) 140/75-15 rear Michelin Scorcher gives that hard-to-turn feeling? Maybe its handlebar is a bit narrower? To me, the Street feels nimbler and more light-footed than the other two bikes.

I’m the only one who likes to flog the Street, which goes around corners better than any Harley since the XR1200R. The Honda CTX has the most ground clearance.


What we also don’t agree upon at all is comfort: Tom and Troy both rated the Street last in the Ergonomics/Comfort category, while yours truly rated it first. Its footpegs are kind of high for taller riders. Tom, who’s 5-foot, 11-inches, says its cockpit is cramped and “simply isn’t designed for anyone north of five-foot nine.” He’s probably correct, but for 5’8 me, the Street’s more-standard-than-cruiser ergonomic triangle is the other big thing it has going for it besides its engine. A compact cockpit with closer footpegs makes it feel more controllable to smaller riders, a subset that includes yours truly. (H-D offers a “Reduced Reach” seat and a Tallboy one, $201.95 each, along with Reduced Reach handlebars in black or chrome, for $69.95.) Thanks to its cush seat and surprisingly good suspension, the Street beat out the Vulcan in the Suspension category. It soaks up the bumps pretty damn well, and encourages maniacal riding like few other Hogs.

Harley-Davidson Street 750</p>+ Highs</p>

• Short people got no reason not to like it
• This Harley makes as much power as the Kawasaki!
• Looks great from a distance and/or in the dark

– Sighs</p>

• Worst production front brake in the modern world
• Needs its owner to tidy up a little bit
• The Motor Company didn’t even change colors for year two

Alas, the poor little Street’s egregious shortcomings outweigh its innate raw goodness. My upvotes could not outweigh the poopoos of my compadres, and so the Street finishes in a resounding last place. America loves its underdogs: Here’s to Harley for keeping on building them for us.

Three Bikes Go In, Two Come Out!

“The Harley has the most traditional profile, but if postmodern-cruiserism is what you’re after, the Vulcan S has an attractive profile, and I personally like the white with minimal green accents.” –T. Roderick. Note the big plastic cover (with genuine brushed aluminum insert) right below the shock that covers up all the ugly stuff that’s exposed on the Harley.


That leaves the new Vulcan S and the year-old Honda CTX700N to duke it out to the finish, sort of a battle between the Kawi’s old-school Japanese cruiser style vs. the Honda’s new-tech functionality with a nod toward tradition. The Kawasaki’s slightly smaller parallel-Twin makes substantially more power and a bit more torque than the Honda’s 21cc-bigger, low-revving 670cc inline-Twin, but the Honda gets more than 60 mpg most tanks and runs so smoooooth…

“I thought the Honda would finish last. All it took was the ride down from Burbank to Santa Ana to realize I was wrong. No one area stands out (except maybe fuel mileage), but it’s a very good motorcycle. If I could sum up the CTX in one word, it’d be “smooth.” It hardly vibrates and the ride is really comfortable.” –T. Siahaan


As Evans Brasstacks learned at the Vulcan’s coming-out party, Kawasaki bumped the Versys 650 Twin’s flywheel mass 28% to make it more cruiserish, and its intake funnels, throttle bodies, exhaust headers and ECU were also modified to improve bottom-end power. Where our last Versys 650 made 54.9 hp at 8200 rpm, the Vulcan pumps out 56.1 at 7300. Also 43.4 lb-ft. of torque at 5700 rpm, compared to the Versys’ 38.9 lb-ft. at 7100 rpm.

On the ScoreCard, the Vulc engine wins: “Like the Harley, the engine is the highlight of the Vulcan S,” says Troy. “It likes to rev and is equally as athletic as the Street 750, if not moreso.” Tom says: “Definitely the best engine in this group. It’s revvy and fun, and more powerful than the larger displacement V-Twin powering the Harley.” (Right, by 0.55 hp. The Harley makes 0.13 more ft-lbs of torque at only 3800 rpm.)

With the longest wheelbase, lowest seat and fattish tires, the Vulcan S makes a tough-guy statement it reinforces by kicking your butt with the worst rear suspension. It’s great on smooth pavement like this.


Meanwhile, the Honda’s low-revving half-a-car engine hangs in there with just 43 hp (at 6100 rpm). Its max torque of 41.5 lb-ft happens at 4700 rpm, but it’s making more than 40 at only 3200 rpm (just like the Harley), and doesn’t have any trouble keeping up with the group until the pace really heats up. Which it really doesn’t very often on these bikes. The Honda has the best gearbox of the group, with short positive throws and a light clutch. The Kawi’s gearbox is good too, but there’s a bit of slop in its linkage, introduced by its new “Ergo-fit” system, which lets you move the forward-mounted foot controls between three positions: “Long throws between gears makes for sloppy shifting,” says T Roderick. True that. The Vulcan does provide adjustable levers for both brake and clutch, though, and its rubber-mounted handlebar keeps the vibes at bay; 80 mph at 6000 rpm isn’t as serenely smooth as the Honda, but it’s close. The Street’s (solid-mounted) handlebar is quite a bit vibier at freeway speed. Also, the ABS brakes on our Kawi only add $400 to the Vulcan’s $6,999 bottom line. If you want ABS on the Honda, you’ll have to add $600 and take the auto gearbox too. And if you want it on the Harley, you are SOL, as they say in the vernacular.

The Vulcan’s Ergo-Fit system lets you order your bike with the mid-reach seat (this one), one with a thicker bolster on back for shorties, and one with less bolster for tall people. Handlebars are also swappable. Footpegs you can move between three positions.


The only place the Vulcan really comes up short is in the Suspension category, where it finishes last on our ScoreCard. It uses the same type lay-down shock on the right side as its sister-bikes Versys and Ninja 650, but unlike those two, the Vulcan works its shock through a linkage system. Kawasaki claims there’s 3.2 inches of rear-wheel travel, and they’re usually telling the truth, but over bumps that the Harley and Honda absorb nicely, the Vulcan feels almost like a hardtail, connecting with powerful gluteal uppercuts that put daylight between seat and rider. Which is sad, because sister Versys is so comfortably the opposite.

Kawasaki Vulcan S</p>+ Highs</p>

• Adjustable ergonomics is a great idea
• Fun, revvable motor
• Longest and lowest

– Sighs</p>

• Harsh rear suspension
• Kawasaki still going for the gold in Ugly Exhaust Olympics
• Are you sure you don’t want this engine in the Versys?

The Honda may have the least power, but it also has the least weight along with the best brakes and chassis, and that makes it the easiest to ride pretty quickly on backroads.


The CTX is the most polished, comfortable and easiest-riding package. Some say “appliance-like” as if it’s a bad thing. And even if you ordered up the Dual Clutch auto transmission/ABS option, MSRP $7,599, it’s still a little cheaper than the Harley.


If it’s homogenized semi-raw-edged Japanese cruiser you’re after, you want the Kawasaki. If it’s suave and sophisticated, it’s hard to beat the CTX, which we all agreed has the best suspension, the best seat – and would win the ergonomics sweepstakes if only its footpegs were in the same zip code as the rest of it. If you have giraffe legs and fused knees, the CTX is your bike, and in fact, for urban trawling, the footpegs are less of a problem than they are on the highway, where way-forward feet make it that much more difficult to brace against the wind.

There really aren’t any frills on the Honda, which keeps the price down, but everything that is there is elemental, well-lubricated and functional, from the easy-reading LCD instruments to the Pro-Link shock out back that serves up 4.3 inches of the best suspension here, and helps the Honda handily win the Handling portion of the competition. The only thing missing from it is the excellent storage compartment of its sister-ship NC700X, a thing I promised I wouldn’t point out again but failed. Every Honda used to come with a helmet lock. No more.

Honda CTX700N</p>+ Highs</p>

• So dialled it’s hard to believe it’s only two years old
• Fuel mileage is hybrid-like
• Is “low-key cruiser” an oxymoron?

– Sighs</p>

• The footpegs arrive two minutes before the rest of the motorcycle
• Its “storage compartment” is a cruel joke next to the NC700X’s
• Is “practical motorcycle” also an oxymoron?

The Winner Is…


And the winner, in a photo finish, is the new Kawasaki Vulcan S – edging out the Honda by less than a percentage point in both Objective and Subjective scoring to take the overall win by 0.34%. If you’re torn, find your nearest Honda/Kawasaki dealer and sit on both to decide. If you like it when the salesperson comes over to talk to you and you have hours to kill, you’re probably a Kawasaki guy. If you wish he’d go away so you can make up your own mind and get on with your life, the Honda is for you.

Say, this was fun. Tearing around like maniacs in the canyons is always good, but slowing down a little and taking in the sights is a whole other kind of soothing. Anybody need a latte?

Midsize Post-Modern Cruiser Shootout ScorecardCategoryHarley-Davidson
Street 750Honda
CTX700NKawasaki
Vulcan SPrice93.3%100%94.6%Weight95.1%100%97.0%lb/hp96.7%79.5%100%lb/lb-ft98.3%98.3%100%Engine82.5%82.5%85.8%Transmission/Clutch73.3%83.3%75.0%Handling68.3%80.0%75.0%Brakes48.3%76.7%81.7%Suspension73.3% 83.3%70.0%Technologies48.3%60.0%74.2%Instruments58.3%78.3%76.7%Ergonomics/Comfort66.7%76.7%78.3%Quality, Fit & Finish50.0%81.7%78.3%Cool Factor75.0%68.3%75.0%Grin Factor66.7%71.7%71.7%Overall Score72.0%80.9%81.3%Midsize Post-Modern Cruiser Shootout SpecsHarley-Davidson Street 750Honda CTX700NKawasaki Vulcan SMSRP$7,794
($7499 in basic black)$6,999
(DCT ABS $7,599)$7,399
(Vulcan S non-ABS $6,999)Engine Type753cc liquid-cooled 60-deg. V-Twin670cc liquid-cooled parallel Twin649cc liquid-cooled parallel TwinBore and Stroke85.0 x 66.0mm73.0 x 80.0mm83.0 x 60.0mmHP55.5 hp @ 7900 rpm43.4 hp @ 6100 rpm56.1 hp @ 7300 rpmTorque43.5 @ 3800 rpm41.5 lb-ft. @ 4700 rpm43.4 lb-ft. @ 5700 rpmFuel SystemMikuni single-port EFI, 38mm throttle bodyPGM-FI, 36mm throttle bodyEFI; two 38mm throttle bodiesIgnitionDigital inductiveDigital inductiveDigital inductiveCompression Ratio11.0:110.7:110.8:1Valve TrainSOHC; 4 valves/cyl.SOHC; 4 valves/cyl.DOHC; 4 valves/cyl.EmissionsClosed-loop 3-way catalytic convertercurrent EPA and CARB in Californiacurrent EPA and CARB in CaliforniaTransmission6-speed6-speed6-speedFinal DriveBeltChainChainFront Suspension37mm fork; 5.5 in. travel41mm fork; 4.2 in. travel41mm fork; 5.1 in. travelRear SuspensionTwin coil-over shocks, preload adjustable; 3.5 in wheel travelPro-Link single shock; 4.3 in. travelSingle shock; 3.2 in wheel travel; adjustable spring preloadFront Brake292mm disc; 2-piston caliper320mm disc; 2-piston caliper300mm disc; 2-piston caliper; ABSRear Brake260mm disc; 2-piston caliper240mm disc; single-piston caliper250mm disc; 2-piston caliper; ABSFront Tire100/80-17120/70-17120/70 – 18Rear Tire140/75-15160/60-17160/60-17Rake/Trail32°/4.5 in (115mm)27.7°/4.4 in (114mm)31°/4.7 in (119mm)Wheelbase60.4 in60.2 in62.0 inSeat Height27.9 in28.3 in.27.8 inCurb Weight509 lb484 lb.499 lbFuel Capacity3.5 gal3.17 gal.3.7 galObserved fuel mileage42 mpg61 mpg45 mpgStorage Capacitynonetiny gloveboxzilchAvailable colorsBlack, MaroonBlackGreen, White, RedWarranty24 months, unlimited milesOne year, unlimited miles24 months (Limited Factory Warranty)Midsize Post-Modern Cruiser Shootout: Harley-Davidson Street 750 v. Honda CTX700N v. Kawasaki Vulcan S + Video appeared first on Motorcycle.com.



Click here for full story...