|
View Poll Results: What effect on fuel mileage did your 15T sprocket have? | |||
Decreased mileage | 0 | 0% | |
No change | 6 | 42.86% | |
Increased mileage | 7 | 50.00% | |
I don't track mileage | 1 | 7.14% | |
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
June 16th, 2011, 02:56 PM | #1 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Frugal
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW)
Join Date: Mar 2010 Motorcycle(s): Several Posts: A lot.
|
To those who have installed a 15T, did your economy change?
I'm doing an informal survey to see if installing a 15T front sprocket had an effect on fuel mileage, and if so, in what direction. If a documented change was noticed, how much was it?
Last futzed with by FrugalNinja250; June 16th, 2011 at 02:58 PM. Reason: more info |
|
June 16th, 2011, 02:57 PM | #2 | |
Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: Too much.
|
Quote:
also, is this only for pregens? if you want everyone's response, perhaps the "general" forum for a better cross section? |
|
|
June 16th, 2011, 03:27 PM | #3 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Colin
Location: Bay Area
Join Date: Feb 2011 Motorcycle(s): '96 EX250 Posts: A lot.
|
Don't forget "how did you calculate and document the change?" and "have your riding habits changed?"
|
|
June 17th, 2011, 08:04 AM | #4 | |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Jason
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Join Date: May 2010 Motorcycle(s): 09 Ninja 250R SE, 07 Honda CRF230F, 06 Honda CRF150F Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
To be real technical, we would also need information on whether most of the riding was done on the highway, city, stuck in traffic, climbing mountains, track, etc.... The list goes on and on....
__________________________________________________
09 250R SE: Paying it forward one post at a time! Don't forget to add yourself to our Member Map |
|
|
June 19th, 2011, 06:07 PM | #5 |
ninjette.org member
Name: Dave
Location: San Diego
Join Date: Apr 2009 Motorcycle(s): 250 ninja 2002, 2008 ZX10-R Posts: 149
|
I have (2) 250 ninjas. In 3 tanks on the one, I got 62,64,63mpg with a 15t. On the other bike, with the 14t and correcting for the speedo dif between the two bikes, I got 64mpg.
I use the bikes for commuting on to work going 70-75mpg for 22miles and through city streets with stoplights for 3 miles. 25 mile each way commute. Problem is that when running a 15t, that even though your rpms are lower, you need higher throttle input to get the same thrust. SO, it sort of cancels itself out. Only reason to go 15t then is to get the bike in the proper rev range for the type of driving you do. I think I'll be sticking with the 14t on the one bike, but will be leaving the 15t on the other.
__________________________________________________
90 EX250 Ninja, 92 FZR600, 86 CR125, 77 GS750, 73 RD350, 86 CR250, RD350 in SRX250 frame, 75 RD350, 99 RM125, 99 GSXR750, 07 Reflex, 02 250 Ninja, 02 GSXR1k, 08 ZX10R, 07 250 Ninja, 05 250 ninja |
|
June 19th, 2011, 06:23 PM | #6 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Cody
Location: NoVa
Join Date: Jan 2011 Motorcycle(s): 06 yzf r6r previously: 09 ninja 250r, black 07 zx6r Posts: A lot.
|
No matter how easy I rode with my 14t sprocket I couldn't get above 50-50.5 mpg. I rode rather cautiously on my first tank with my 15t and got 57.5 mpg. I expect the mpg change to be minimal after several tanks with the 15t. I love the higher gearing though; which is much more important .
__________________________________________________
|
|
June 19th, 2011, 08:38 PM | #7 |
ninjette.org member
Name: ___
Location: ___
Join Date: Jul 2010 Motorcycle(s): ___ Posts: 160
|
I got back today from a trip 'up north' to WI and got 67mpg. I was going about 65-75mph on the highway and some back roads. Love this little bike!
|
|
June 19th, 2011, 10:05 PM | #8 |
Texas Newbie
Name: John
Location: D/FW Texas
Join Date: Sep 2010 Motorcycle(s): 07 Ninja EX250, 07 FZ6 Posts: A lot.
|
15t is the best mod by far for the pre-gen...
|
|
June 20th, 2011, 08:49 AM | #9 |
Smoker
Name: Bob
Location: SoCal
Join Date: Dec 2010 Motorcycle(s): Guess.... Posts: 556
|
MPG jumped from mid/highs 40's to mid 50's. Zero change in my riding style other than adjusting for the difference in the way the bike runs. Each gear is taller now, so I can do "more" before shifting. Other than the adjustment to the gearing, I still ride it like it's a rental - no mercy.
|
|
June 23rd, 2011, 06:01 PM | #10 |
ninjette.org member
Name: Donny
Location: Oklahoma City
Join Date: Jun 2011 Motorcycle(s): 2008 250R Posts: 36
|
Just got mt 15T installed today, best mod ever, no more searching for "7th" gear. Lowered my rpms by 500.
|
|
June 27th, 2011, 10:37 PM | #11 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Cody
Location: NoVa
Join Date: Jan 2011 Motorcycle(s): 06 yzf r6r previously: 09 ninja 250r, black 07 zx6r Posts: A lot.
|
My first two tanks after the 15t were 57.5mpg riding easy and 54.5mpg riding her hard with a lot of wot and high rpm. I got around 48mpg average with the stock gearing so it did increase gas mileage but not by a huge amount. I honestly expected better mpg when I bought the bike so this was definitely a plus. I like the taller gearing and the comfortability it gives me more so than the extra mileage.
__________________________________________________
|
|
June 28th, 2011, 05:56 AM | #12 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Frugal
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW)
Join Date: Mar 2010 Motorcycle(s): Several Posts: A lot.
|
My mileage dropped to 48 on a tank last Friday. However, I had full saddlebags and was doing 80 (actual) into a steady 15-18 mph head wind, giving me an effective airspeed of nearly 100 mph. Not surprised my mileage dropped. Coming back with the tail wind and still at 80+ my mileage rose to 59.
|
|
June 28th, 2011, 06:57 PM | #13 |
ninjette.org member
Name: Donny
Location: Oklahoma City
Join Date: Jun 2011 Motorcycle(s): 2008 250R Posts: 36
|
I am nearing the 200 mile mark on my 15T, I plan on filling up on thursday and will post back my MPG results.
|
|
June 28th, 2011, 09:15 PM | #14 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
Sprocket changes do not affect fuel economy.
Still takes the same amount of energy to go just as fast.
__________________________________________________
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 10:28 AM | #15 | |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Frugal
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW)
Join Date: Mar 2010 Motorcycle(s): Several Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
However, the input energy never equals the output energy, and what you're referring to is the output energy. The input energy is in the carbon-hydrogen bonds of the gasoline used as fuel. The motorcycle's systems converts this input energy into the output energy with varying degrees of efficiency. It's in the conversion where you gain or lose fuel mileage. The higher the efficiency, the less fuel is consumed to go a given distance, right? Enter the BSFC map: This is a way of visualizing the relationships between power output, RPM, and fuel consumption in an engine. You can see that fuel consumed for a given power output decreases as RPMs rise, then at a certain RPM range the fuel consumption stabilizes, then actually increases as the RPMs continue to climb. Why is this? Well, there are many, many factors at play, most related to variations in engine design. Intake and exhaust resonant tuning, for instance, greatly affects the RPM band where BSFC numbers are the lowest. Internal engine friction, both mechanical (cams, bearings, piston ring friction, pumping oil, etc.) and that due to pumping losses (it consumes energy to suck air past a throttle plate), all have significant effects on the amount of output energy can be extracted from the input energy. As you can see from the BSFC map above, you get your best efficiency at lower RPMs with higher percentage of available power consumed at that RPM. Horsepower is a function of RPM, as can be illustrated by the horsepower formula: Torque x RPM divided by 5252. The same torque at higher RPMs produced more horsepower. However, at higher RPMs more power is lost due to pumping losses and internal friction, losses that stay the same regardless of whether you're putting out 10 horsepower or 30. If you're only using 10 horsepower at an RPM where 30 is available the losses are higher per horsepower than they would be if you were putting out 10 HP lower in the RPM band where only 15 horsepower was available. The net effect is that you generally want your given power output and RPM to be in the part of the BSFC map where fuel consumption is the lowest, and that's usually lower in the RPM range where power used is a greater proportion of power available. So yes, the amount of output power it takes to go a given speed is the same at any RPM, but the amount of fuel energy consumed to produce that power can vary pretty significantly, and thus significantly affect fuel mileage. The Ninja 250 relies on RPM to get it's maximum power rating, and fuel efficiency is secondary to that. I theorized that moving my cruise RPM lower in the RPM band that I would end up using a higher percentage of available power at cruise to maintain the same speed (available power being lower because of lower RPMs), and thus would move into a more favorable portion of the BSFC map. The reduction in friction and pumping losses helps here as well. The results were conclusive to me, a definite increase in fuel mileage as proven by dozens of measurements before and after the change. Wiki on BSFC (fairly short, it's ok but not great): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brake_s...el_consumption Sample BSFC maps: http://ecomodder.com/wiki/index.php/...28BSFC%29_Maps Then again, maybe all those tens of thousands of engineers and a century of scientific observation and experimentation are wrong... |
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 10:40 AM | #16 | |
ninjette.org dude
Name: 1 guess :-)
Location: SF Bay Area
Join Date: Jun 2008 Motorcycle(s): '13 Ninja 300 (white, the fastest color!), '13 R1200RT, '14 CRF250L, '12 TT-R125LE Posts: Too much.
Blog Entries: 7
|
Quote:
Pumping losses just aren't that different from an engine turning 9000 rpm making X hp and an engine turning 8500 rpm and making the same X hp. A few percent of rev changes are a fraction of a percent of economy differences. The analogy would be someone deciding to substitute one diet can of soda per month for a normal can. It can be scientifically proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the individual is taking in X fewer calories per month due to that change. But everything else they eat and/or every bit of exercise they choose to partake in that month will have a much more significant effect on their ultimate weight gain/loss. Sprocket changes aren't a panacea for economy gains. They can be a very small part of it. Riding conditions and riding styles will always have a much, much larger effect.
__________________________________________________
Montgomery Street Motorcycle Club / cal24.com / crf250l.org / ninjette.org ninjette.org Terms of Service Shopping for motorcycle parts or equipment? Come here first. The friendliest Ninja 250R/300/400 forum on the internet! (especially Unregistered) |
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 10:42 AM | #17 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Jason
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Join Date: May 2010 Motorcycle(s): 09 Ninja 250R SE, 07 Honda CRF230F, 06 Honda CRF150F Posts: A lot.
|
oh now you've done it.... Information overload...
__________________________________________________
09 250R SE: Paying it forward one post at a time! Don't forget to add yourself to our Member Map |
|
June 29th, 2011, 10:58 AM | #18 | |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
Great response Frugal.
__________________________________________________
|
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 03:22 PM | #19 | |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Frugal
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW)
Join Date: Mar 2010 Motorcycle(s): Several Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
If you don't want to believe it, then don't, but please don't try and foster the opinion that I'm imagining things or am incapable of real empirical observations and statistical analysis. I actually took this stuff in college... |
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 03:39 PM | #20 | |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
I dont mean to sound rude. The question came up after reading this post.
__________________________________________________
|
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 03:50 PM | #21 |
ninjette.org Monkey Spank
Name: Kevin
Location: Illinois
Join Date: Apr 2009 Motorcycle(s): 2008 250R Track-Bike Woodcraft clip-ons and rearsets FZ-6 track bike Posts: A lot.
|
ok, so YES a 15T or 3 off the rear will result in better fuel economy an average.
__________________________________________________
Black 250R Full Area P QC Dyno Jet Kit 100 main 41T Rear Sprocket |
|
June 29th, 2011, 04:11 PM | #22 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
Yes. According to the data.
__________________________________________________
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 04:35 PM | #23 |
ninjette.org guru
Name: Al
Location: Bay Area
Join Date: Mar 2011 Motorcycle(s): C-250R-ST Posts: 287
|
I did the sprockets change: 15f - 42r on my '09 250r
90% freeway = 68mpg @ 60-65mph (up from 62mpg) |
|
June 29th, 2011, 04:46 PM | #24 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
one for mythbusters? I think if two riders in the salt flats decided to test this doing exactly the same speed, then yes I could understand a 15T doing a little better. Throw in all the real senarios of driving and I think the difference will be neglegible.
__________________________________________________
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 06:11 PM | #25 | |
ninjette.org dude
Name: 1 guess :-)
Location: SF Bay Area
Join Date: Jun 2008 Motorcycle(s): '13 Ninja 300 (white, the fastest color!), '13 R1200RT, '14 CRF250L, '12 TT-R125LE Posts: Too much.
Blog Entries: 7
|
Quote:
If you have all of that data, post the variation in tanks across both timescales, and it will be much easier for you and everyone else to judge the effectiveness of the sprocket on improving fuel economy. Heck, didn't you mention you got 48 mpg on just the last tank? The only thing I learned in 5 semesters of college stats is that with enough time and effort, you can get them to mean anything.
__________________________________________________
Montgomery Street Motorcycle Club / cal24.com / crf250l.org / ninjette.org ninjette.org Terms of Service Shopping for motorcycle parts or equipment? Come here first. The friendliest Ninja 250R/300/400 forum on the internet! (especially Unregistered) |
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 06:40 PM | #26 |
Over 40 Ninjette Owner
Name: John
Location: Lancaster, Pa
Join Date: May 2010 Motorcycle(s): 2008 Kawasaki VN900C (Black)/2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250R (Red) SOLD BOTH Posts: 77
|
OK. Did not touch the front sprocket but went down to 41 tooth on the rear. Have averaged the higher range (65-67mpg) vs. the 45 tooth (61-64mpg) dependent upon where/how I drive. I have had a reading of 69mpg, but that was probably an anomaly as my girlfriend's brother had the bike for a week so I'm not sure about his fill up technique, so my estimates for fuel economy would be suspect. The primary reason for the sprocket change was to increase fuel economy, and I primarily use it for work/minor shopping trips/visit the girlfriend. Quite happy with it!
Johnny
__________________________________________________
So Long, and Thanks for All The Fish! Vulcan 900 Custom: Cafe windscreen, OEM backrest and Lockable side cases!!! |
|
June 29th, 2011, 06:57 PM | #27 | |
ninjette.org Monkey Spank
Name: Kevin
Location: Illinois
Join Date: Apr 2009 Motorcycle(s): 2008 250R Track-Bike Woodcraft clip-ons and rearsets FZ-6 track bike Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
Best thing about the 41 rear is 7000rpm-60mph 8000-70mph 9000-80mph Not exactly but real close. but theres plenty left in the motor at 80mph at 9000rpm
__________________________________________________
Black 250R Full Area P QC Dyno Jet Kit 100 main 41T Rear Sprocket |
|
|
June 29th, 2011, 08:09 PM | #28 |
Over 40 Ninjette Owner
Name: John
Location: Lancaster, Pa
Join Date: May 2010 Motorcycle(s): 2008 Kawasaki VN900C (Black)/2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250R (Red) SOLD BOTH Posts: 77
|
Almost40:
On the RARE occasions I try to see what it can do, the tach shows 10K rpm's at 95 indicated. What kind of quarter mile ET's you getting? I've seen people (Racer X, I think) get under 15, but only after doing a wee bit of work to it. Still impressive for a 250! Johnny
__________________________________________________
So Long, and Thanks for All The Fish! Vulcan 900 Custom: Cafe windscreen, OEM backrest and Lockable side cases!!! |
|
June 30th, 2011, 10:18 AM | #29 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Frugal
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW)
Join Date: Mar 2010 Motorcycle(s): Several Posts: A lot.
|
You got me, Alex, you've caught me in The Lie. (Though, you forgot to mention the context, namely, the circumstances where I explained why I got 48 on that tank. Color me surprised...) It's obvious to me that you Believe that changing sprockets can have no effect on gas mileage. You have utter Faith that you are correct in your Belief. If there's one thing I've learned in my many decades of life, it's that True Believers will Believe what they Believe, regardless of *any* information that contradicts those Beliefs. I could post my data, take up a whole page of the forum, but honestly, I know you won't believe it. And the whole question arises, why do I have to prove this to you in the first place? A thousand other claims get posted on this forum and yet this is the only one that prompts you to demand the data to support the conclusion. A rather trivial conclusion, at that. I'm already noting innuendo and sarcastic personal attacks by other members against me, stuff like "FrugleBugle" and "...more time calculating your mileage", etc, just because I have apparently committed heresy by claiming a sprocket change increased my gas mileage. This is evidently the kind of forum where behavior like this is expected and tolerated. That's too bad, Life's too short to put up with crap, it honestly is. I've found that when the sarcasm and snide comments start (especially from a moderator!) and the trolling starts (Buffalony) then it's time to depart. Later... |
|
June 30th, 2011, 10:36 AM | #30 |
ninjette.org dude
Name: 1 guess :-)
Location: SF Bay Area
Join Date: Jun 2008 Motorcycle(s): '13 Ninja 300 (white, the fastest color!), '13 R1200RT, '14 CRF250L, '12 TT-R125LE Posts: Too much.
Blog Entries: 7
|
Frugal - I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm not trying to be snide. Though I do employ sarcasm at times (OK, alot!), it's very rarely mean-spirited, and it certainly wasn't here. I've got an engineering background just like many others here, and data trumps blind belief just about anywhere.
You apparently have the data to show that there has been a small uplift in mileage from changing your sprockets to a 7% taller final-drive ratio. The data you've posted so far shows about a 5% gain in economy. That seems very, very high to me. In a bike that cannot adjust its fuel mapping on the fly (stone-age carbs), the fuel usage across the rev range, and the throttle range is quite linear, so it cannot take advantage of any lean-burning or other tactics to lower fuel usage on lower revs and lower load. If I were a betting man (heck, I am a betting man!) I'd put it at a 3.5% expected gain due to 7% lower revs, and call it a day. I guess in this thread, you're right, in that the question being asked isn't "how do you maximize your mileage on the ninjette?", and that's the question I keep answering, with someone choosing how hard to dial that right handlebar control being the prime factor in fuel mileage, either up or down. Your point is more targeted, that if one has already optimized everything else, going slightly taller on sprockets results in slightly better mileage. And as I said in the post above, and in this one as well, you're likely correct. What the poll results do show (limited as they are), is that half of the people who do make the same sprocket change, aren't seeing any mileage benefit. And half of them are. I think that goes to the main point that I have been trying to make (evidently not without annoying you), is that this isn't a big deal in the overall scheme of how to improve the mileage on a ninjette. But to your point, it's not nothing, either.
__________________________________________________
Montgomery Street Motorcycle Club / cal24.com / crf250l.org / ninjette.org ninjette.org Terms of Service Shopping for motorcycle parts or equipment? Come here first. The friendliest Ninja 250R/300/400 forum on the internet! (especially Unregistered) |
|
June 30th, 2011, 10:53 AM | #31 | |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
Sorry if you took our stance toward the topic as a personal attack, it was not intended as such. This subject has come up a few times over the past 2-3 years and no data was ever presented supporting the claim. So far I believe this topic is a two sided arguement. I also believe this cant be proven correctly without the proper gadgets and gizmos such as those used on mythbusters. The episode that comes to mind with this is the pickup truck tailgate up or tailgate down. They determined a pickup with tailgate up actually had less drag. Anyhoo the flowmeters and such they used would suit this scenario quite well. Post the data. I agree that it will be scrutinized. If it's valid and spot on cheers. Don't believe views can't change.
__________________________________________________
|
|
|
June 30th, 2011, 11:02 AM | #32 | |
ninjette.org dude
Name: 1 guess :-)
Location: SF Bay Area
Join Date: Jun 2008 Motorcycle(s): '13 Ninja 300 (white, the fastest color!), '13 R1200RT, '14 CRF250L, '12 TT-R125LE Posts: Too much.
Blog Entries: 7
|
Quote:
__________________________________________________
Montgomery Street Motorcycle Club / cal24.com / crf250l.org / ninjette.org ninjette.org Terms of Service Shopping for motorcycle parts or equipment? Come here first. The friendliest Ninja 250R/300/400 forum on the internet! (especially Unregistered) |
|
|
June 30th, 2011, 02:03 PM | #33 | |
ninjette.org Monkey Spank
Name: Kevin
Location: Illinois
Join Date: Apr 2009 Motorcycle(s): 2008 250R Track-Bike Woodcraft clip-ons and rearsets FZ-6 track bike Posts: A lot.
|
Quote:
Havent been to the dragstrip in a LONG time. Bought this bike, took it to the race track.....and thats all she wrote.
__________________________________________________
Black 250R Full Area P QC Dyno Jet Kit 100 main 41T Rear Sprocket |
|
|
July 1st, 2011, 08:37 AM | #34 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
Really! I havent seen that one. Thats awesome. I'll have to add that one to the mod list jk
__________________________________________________
|
|
July 7th, 2011, 07:13 PM | #35 |
ninjette.org member
Name: Donny
Location: Oklahoma City
Join Date: Jun 2011 Motorcycle(s): 2008 250R Posts: 36
|
Filled up yesterday went 235 miles and put 4 gallons in exactly, got 63 MPG with LOTS of wot runs to 13k. Not bad, same MPG as with the 14T and same driving style.
|
|
July 11th, 2011, 01:09 PM | #36 |
ninjette.org member
Name: ___
Location: ___
Join Date: Jul 2010 Motorcycle(s): ___ Posts: 160
|
Filled up again and this time I got 69.14 mpg (153 miles on 2.204 gallons). Not bad considering 80% is stop and go in town riding. Delicious .
|
|
July 11th, 2011, 05:12 PM | #37 |
ninjette.org sage
Name: Luke
Location: Sevierville, TN
Join Date: May 2011 Motorcycle(s): 06 Buell Uly, 05 VStar 1100 Posts: 577
|
|
|
July 14th, 2011, 09:31 PM | #38 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Joe
Location: Buffalo NY
Join Date: Jan 2009 Motorcycle(s): 08 Ninja 250 "Wasabi", 82 Yamaha xj650j Posts: A lot.
|
I shimed the needles and pulled the snorkel. Now I'm getting 62mpg and it's a heck of alot more fun.
__________________________________________________
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JT 15T new gen sprocket installed incorrectly?? | raytwotimes | 2008 - 2012 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 4 | June 19th, 2014 06:36 PM |
15T Sprocket change decreased MPG :( | GreenNinja | 2008 - 2012 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 6 | August 30th, 2011 06:40 AM |
15t Sprocket Brands | lonewolf05 | 2008 - 2012 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 5 | March 4th, 2011 09:39 PM |
In the market for sprockets to increase fuel economy. 15T front, ?? rear? | CZroe | 2008 - 2012 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 40 | March 11th, 2010 01:30 PM |
went from 14t sprocket to 15t | speedgsx98 | 1986 - 2007 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 4 | May 11th, 2009 04:18 PM |
|
|