April 5th, 2014, 09:38 AM | #1 |
Motorcycle Hypermiler
Name: Vic
Location: Livermore CA
Join Date: Jan 2012 Motorcycle(s): 1999 & 2005 Kawasaki Ninja 250R's Posts: A lot.
|
Improving low end torque: questions for the motor gurus
In my ongoing quest for maximum fuel economy for my Ninjettes, I was wondering about some ways to improve efficiency by modifying the motor so that it is optimized for the lower rpm range ( 4K to 8K) that I operate my motos at.
The ideas I'm interested in are 1) advancing the ignition timimg, 2)advancing the cam timing,and 3)reducing the valve spring pressure. Has anyone done any modifications in these areas? If so , please share the details and how successful you were with it. These mods have potential for improvements but also have the riskfor catastrophic engine damage. Any knowledge or exeperience you can share is greatly appreciated. @Racer x, @rojoracing53, @csmith12, @Motofool, @alex.s
__________________________________________________
235 MPG Hypermotorcycling to a better tomorrow |
|
April 5th, 2014, 09:48 AM | #2 |
Que Buenos Son!!!
Name: Ryan
Location: Grovetucky, OH
Join Date: Jun 2012 Motorcycle(s): Aprilia Shiver 750, Husaberg FE 450, Ninja 300 (sold), xr100 Posts: A lot.
MOTM - Nov '14
|
I know adjusting valve clearance to the high or loose end of spec will give you more mid range power. Tight valves give better top end power.
__________________________________________________
Don't do something because it's easy,.. Do it because it's not! If you aren't going forward, then you're falling behind. "Drive it like you stole it"!!! |
|
April 5th, 2014, 10:05 AM | #3 | |
Daily Ninjette rider
Name: Hernan
Location: Florida
Join Date: Mar 2011 Motorcycle(s): 2007 Ninja 250 Posts: A lot.
MOTY - 2016, MOTM - Dec '12, Jan '14, Jan '15, May '16
|
Quote:
The valves and the detonation are the main things that limit that. The point at which the engine generates the highest torque is what you want to sustain, for whatever gear combination it takes. That means that the breathing of the engine is optimal at that point. More power (number of strokes per time = HP) can be generated for higher rpm's, but increased parts' friction and difficulty of breathing are the limiters there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_band http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_tuning Our engines are made of fast and light parts that move as little as possible (short strokes). That makes them peak performance, reason for which they have transmission boxes of six steps, so we can always be close to the peak of torque or to the peak of HP as convenient. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engine_efficiency Our engines are pretty efficient as they are. In my opinion, timing modifications may do more harm than good to the whole orchestra of factors. Again, higher compression ratio and injected fuel are always a direct improvement in the road of efficiency.
__________________________________________________
Motofool .................................Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly "Mankind is composed of two sorts of men — those who love and create, and those who hate and destroy. Love is the bond between men, the way to teach and the center of the world." - José Martí |
|
|
April 5th, 2014, 10:05 AM | #4 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Eric
Location: Iowa City
Join Date: May 2009 Motorcycle(s): 2008 Kawmeracchi 350 2010 Project X Posts: A lot.
Blog Entries: 54
MOTM - Sep '18, Feb '16
|
I really have never done anything like that. I would say advanced can timing would help. Smaller ports or smaller and better exhaust resonance.
__________________________________________________
Top speed 123.369mph. Ohio mile Worlds fastest 250 ninja |
|
April 5th, 2014, 10:08 AM | #5 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Eric
Location: Iowa City
Join Date: May 2009 Motorcycle(s): 2008 Kawmeracchi 350 2010 Project X Posts: A lot.
Blog Entries: 54
MOTM - Sep '18, Feb '16
|
Will the higher compression burn more fuel if all else is the same?
__________________________________________________
Top speed 123.369mph. Ohio mile Worlds fastest 250 ninja |
|
April 5th, 2014, 10:12 AM | #6 |
ninjette.org guru
Name: Kevin
Location: Madison
Join Date: Apr 2013 Motorcycle(s): 2004 Ninja 250 Posts: 465
|
|
|
April 5th, 2014, 10:21 AM | #7 |
Motorcycle Hypermiler
Name: Vic
Location: Livermore CA
Join Date: Jan 2012 Motorcycle(s): 1999 & 2005 Kawasaki Ninja 250R's Posts: A lot.
|
Wow! quick responses, thanks guys!
@ninjamunky85 , correct, I already run my valve clearance at max loose end. @Motofool, I hadn't thought much about increasing the CR as it is pretty high already but maybe I could it increase it slightly for some gains. I wonder what the max would be and still be able to use pumped gasoline. Eric, thanks for the other suggestions , I would think raising the CR wouldn't raise the fuel consumption but would present more potential for detonation.
__________________________________________________
235 MPG Hypermotorcycling to a better tomorrow |
|
April 5th, 2014, 10:24 AM | #8 | |
Daily Ninjette rider
Name: Hernan
Location: Florida
Join Date: Mar 2011 Motorcycle(s): 2007 Ninja 250 Posts: A lot.
MOTY - 2016, MOTM - Dec '12, Jan '14, Jan '15, May '16
|
Quote:
Higher pressure along the work stroke means higher force over the same area of the head of the piston. Engine's mechanical work is force times distance. Distance is fix per the stroke's length. Force comes from the pressure after the explosion. Power (HP) is engine mechanical work in any unit of time (more rpms' = more HP) By restricting the aspiration duct, partial throttle allows less fuel-air mix into the combustion chamber; hence, less pressure at the end of the compression stroke and lower temperature of combustion.
__________________________________________________
Motofool .................................Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly "Mankind is composed of two sorts of men — those who love and create, and those who hate and destroy. Love is the bond between men, the way to teach and the center of the world." - José Martí |
|
1 out of 1 members found this post helpful. |
April 5th, 2014, 10:38 AM | #9 |
ninjette.org guru
Name: Kevin
Location: Madison
Join Date: Apr 2013 Motorcycle(s): 2004 Ninja 250 Posts: 465
|
Are you looking for higher mpg or lower cost per mile?
|
|
April 5th, 2014, 10:44 AM | #10 |
ninjette.org guru
Name: Kevin
Location: Madison
Join Date: Apr 2013 Motorcycle(s): 2004 Ninja 250 Posts: 465
|
Are you running maximum tire pressure and ceramic wheel bearings? Non-O ring chain?
|
|
April 5th, 2014, 11:06 AM | #11 |
Participant
Name: Dave
Location: South of Seattle
Join Date: Oct 2012 Motorcycle(s): '94 K75 std Posts: Too much.
MOTM - Aug '15
|
Consider getting a KLX250 or KLR250 (or one of the other 'big 4' dualsport equivalents). The thumpers are much torquier down low (the KLR250 redlines at 9500 rpm). They get pretty good fuel economy, too: on par with the Ninjette.
And I'd like to see what kind of bodywork/fairings you'd put on it! |
|
April 5th, 2014, 02:22 PM | #12 |
Que Buenos Son!!!
Name: Ryan
Location: Grovetucky, OH
Join Date: Jun 2012 Motorcycle(s): Aprilia Shiver 750, Husaberg FE 450, Ninja 300 (sold), xr100 Posts: A lot.
MOTM - Nov '14
|
@greenaero What about swapping the head for one from a new gen 250? I don't even know if they are compatible but if they are the new gen was designed to be torquier than the pre gen.
__________________________________________________
Don't do something because it's easy,.. Do it because it's not! If you aren't going forward, then you're falling behind. "Drive it like you stole it"!!! |
|
April 5th, 2014, 02:32 PM | #13 |
ninjette.org certified postwhore
Name: Paul
Location: UK
Join Date: Apr 2014 Motorcycle(s): Ninja 250, Yamaha RS200 (classic) Posts: A lot.
|
Worth looking at the kawasaki el250 engine
It was a custom that used a detuned gpx250 engine, less bhp but I believe a better torque spread more appropriate to a custom. Possibly an ecu, carbs and camshafts swap with one of those would get you on the right road. Whatever the factory changed. |
|
April 6th, 2014, 12:37 PM | #14 |
Motorcycle Hypermiler
Name: Vic
Location: Livermore CA
Join Date: Jan 2012 Motorcycle(s): 1999 & 2005 Kawasaki Ninja 250R's Posts: A lot.
|
let's see:
@quarterliter: The Vetter Challenge winner is lowest cents/mile for fuel used which is my ultimate goal but to be achieved within a reasonable cost for the vehicle. If total cost ( vehicle,+ modifications, + fuel) were the deciding factor, I'd easily be the champ. So as long as I'm running on gasoline I need to improve on my mpg ( 146 mpg best, 131 mpg best in competition). I'm running pretty high tire pressures ( 40/40psi minimum for regular running, 46/50 psi for competition ) and a non o-ring chain.. I'm still using conventional wheel bearings ; I've heard that the ceramics are a bit fragile for regular street use. Definitely something to think about. @dcj13, I agree a torquey single would be the ideal choice for a max fuel economy vehicle but the use of fully enclosed streamlining presents cooling challenges for air-cooled motors. If I stay with gasoline power, I'd probably look for a Honda CBR250R ( single, water-cooled, EFI) for my next platform. If I could pick up a good water-cooled single on the cheap, I'd definitely consider switching over. @ninjamunky85, interesting idea about the new-gen head. I wonder about CR, valve timing and profile difference too, though the new-gens never seem to produce the FE that the pre-gens do. @Ninjinsky, agree that the EL250 would be a good platform. I've looked for them but they are pretty rare to find one at a good price. Also if I change platforms I'd probably go with a water-cooled 250cc single. I'm hoping to close the gap with my primary competitiors( Fred Hayes and Alan Smith). Fred was about 30 mpg better in our last competition together and with his resources( 162 mpg best, diesel powered) I'm unlikely to catch him. I've stayed close to Alan but this year he is working on a radically lowered Ninja 250 with some engine tweaks. Standing still in competition is falling behind.
__________________________________________________
235 MPG Hypermotorcycling to a better tomorrow |
|
April 6th, 2014, 01:05 PM | #15 | |
Que Buenos Son!!!
Name: Ryan
Location: Grovetucky, OH
Join Date: Jun 2012 Motorcycle(s): Aprilia Shiver 750, Husaberg FE 450, Ninja 300 (sold), xr100 Posts: A lot.
MOTM - Nov '14
|
Quote:
__________________________________________________
Don't do something because it's easy,.. Do it because it's not! If you aren't going forward, then you're falling behind. "Drive it like you stole it"!!! |
|
|
April 6th, 2014, 02:06 PM | #16 |
ninjette.org guru
Name: scott
Location: australia
Join Date: Jan 2012 Motorcycle(s): 2012 ninja 250r se Posts: 435
|
what do the rules say about turbo or supercharging, even fit an electric motor with an aircon gas clutch so it releases at a certain rpm. eg old toyota mr2 superchearger.
And tune the bike not for power but very lean |
|
April 7th, 2014, 07:39 AM | #17 |
The Corner Whisperer
Name: Chris (aka Reactor)
Location: Northern KY
Join Date: May 2011 Motorcycle(s): 2010 250 (track), 1992 250, 2006 R6 (street/track), 2008 R6 (track) Posts: Too much.
MOTY 2015, MOTM - Nov '12, Nov '13
|
Let's think outside the box for a minute.
Is there a rule that says the engine has to be running the entire time? lol
__________________________________________________
Goal: Shake A Million Hands | Look through the corners | Track Day Prep | Closest track? | The Mid-Ohio School |
|
April 7th, 2014, 12:40 PM | #18 |
ninjette.org guru
Name: Kevin
Location: Madison
Join Date: Apr 2013 Motorcycle(s): 2004 Ninja 250 Posts: 465
|
I think you have optimized everything that is relatively inexpensive. Anything more will be very expensive and for minimal gains.
A new platform would be the easiest way to Improve fuel economy. As previously noted, a CBR250 Would be a great place to start. |
|
April 7th, 2014, 01:11 PM | #19 | |
Rev Limiter
Name: Jay
Location: WI
Join Date: Jul 2013 Motorcycle(s): '06 SV650n, '00 Derbi GPR, '64 CA77 Dream 305, '70 CL450 Scrambler, numerous dirt bikes Posts: A lot.
MOTM - Jun '18, Oct '16
|
Quote:
The new Vetter Challenges require a competitor to stay between a leading and tailing vehicle at highway speeds. If the tailing vehicle passes you - your out. For other types of competitions it is common to accelerate to a maximum set speed and completely shut off the engine while coasting to your minimum set speed - back and forth the entire time - only running the engine when acceleration is required. |
|
|
April 7th, 2014, 01:22 PM | #20 |
Rev Limiter
Name: Jay
Location: WI
Join Date: Jul 2013 Motorcycle(s): '06 SV650n, '00 Derbi GPR, '64 CA77 Dream 305, '70 CL450 Scrambler, numerous dirt bikes Posts: A lot.
MOTM - Jun '18, Oct '16
|
Vic - as far as mods for mileage go, I don't recall exactly what you have done.
Are you running 87 octane no ethanol? Have you gone to a hotter plug? I may also go to a thinner oil like a synthetic 5W-30 oil like Motul or Redline. Changing cam profiles and timing could help. Increasing compression would be a good idea also. As far as bigger gains, reducing the size of the carbs, or possibly going to a single carb would be helpful, as would reducing the diameter of the exhaust to increase velocity. F.I. could be an advantage. Directing heated air into the intake might be a benefit, but you would need to rejet based on the higher temps and less air density - and that could be difficult. |
|
April 7th, 2014, 02:58 PM | #21 |
ninjette.org guru
Name: Jesse
Location: Maryville, TN
Join Date: Nov 2012 Motorcycle(s): Ugly 89 frankenstien special ex250, and the "Zooks" : 1982 GS450 and 1979 GS1000 Posts: 327
|
Maybe take a look at the Ignition Advance Kit about 2/3 of the way down this page: http://www.factorypro.com/prod_pages/prodk04.html
Looks like an offset flywheel key to advance ignition timing. The dyno chart there does show a bump at around 6000 rpm, which is right where you're looking for help. Might be worth $70 to try? Does seem like a lot of $$ for an offset key though.
__________________________________________________
Oh god the bikes are multiplying!!! |
|
April 7th, 2014, 03:19 PM | #22 |
Long Time Rider
Name: Blue
Location: Charlotte, NC
Join Date: Sep 2010 Motorcycle(s): 2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250R Posts: A lot.
|
Ever considered better spark efficiency as part of the hypermiler solution?
Takai Hi-Output Super Coils http://www.takai-racing.com/takai/ta...-99-p-451.html |
|
April 7th, 2014, 03:48 PM | #23 |
wat
Name: wat
Location: tustin/long beach
Join Date: Sep 2009 Motorcycle(s): wat Posts: Too much.
Blog Entries: 5
MOTM - Oct '12, Feb '14
|
if you leave the engine off and instead push the bike, you get much higher gas milage i've found.
__________________________________________________
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low end power?? | gregoryl | 1986 - 2007 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 16 | December 1st, 2014 09:32 AM |
Low end adjustment help | Noobman | 2008 - 2012 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 1 | August 9th, 2014 08:51 PM |
improving low end power | james250ninja | 1986 - 2007 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 16 | November 17th, 2013 05:37 PM |
Low End Problems | xaple | 2008 - 2012 Ninja 250R Tech Talk | 21 | July 20th, 2013 08:31 PM |
How to end a bad day? Low-side in the rain. | Monkeytofu | !%@*#$%!)@#&!%@ I crashed! | 28 | October 24th, 2012 04:12 PM |
|
|