ninjette.org

Go Back   ninjette.org > General > Riding Skills

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 20th, 2016, 08:35 AM   #41
allanoue
ninjette.org certified postwhore
 
allanoue's Avatar
 
Name: Al
Location: York, Pa
Join Date: Dec 2012

Motorcycle(s): 2013 Ninja 300..............2008 Ninja 500-sold...2009 Ninja 250-Crashed

Posts: Too much.
MOTM - Sep '14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motofool View Post
When I am not sure of the available traction (rainy day on unfamiliar road, for example), I use that learned feeling as a reference to test it.
I wait for a safe opportunity and progressively apply the front brake until the front tire skids, immediately releasing the lever before steering is lost.
__________________________________________________

Keep calm and ride on -Motofool
Never quit on a rainy day -ally99
allanoue is offline   Reply With Quote




Old April 20th, 2016, 09:22 AM   #42
csmith12
The Corner Whisperer
 
csmith12's Avatar
 
Name: Chris (aka Reactor)
Location: Northern KY
Join Date: May 2011

Motorcycle(s): 2010 250 (track), 1992 250, 2006 R6 (street/track), 2008 R6 (track)

Posts: Too much.
MOTY 2015, MOTM - Nov '12, Nov '13
Quote:
Originally Posted by choneofakind View Post
from looking at sporty motorcycles, I assume they carry the majority of their weight on the front wheel as during static conditions.
While your not totally incorrect, don't assume such things my good man. The general accepted rule for weight distro for pedal bikes would be that 30:70, but those figures do not transfer to road bikes 100%. From my research, a good starting point for a sport bike might be something more like 45/55, it mostly holds true to what most of us are riding these days. To finally reach the 50:50 goal... we must take the rider's weight into account.

From Ducati:

Quote:
The 959 Panigale features a weight distribution equivalent to 52% at the front and 48% at the rear without the rider or fuel. Fully fueled and with the rider, this becomes a perfect 50:50 balance to guarantee absolute stability and handling. To achieve this distribution, placement of the engine, exhaust, and rider were carefully evaluated and determined.
csmith12 is offline   Reply With Quote


2 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
Old April 20th, 2016, 09:41 AM   #43
choneofakind
ninjette.org certified postwhore
 
Name: .
Location: .
Join Date: Feb 2011

Motorcycle(s): .

Posts: Too much.
MOTM - Feb '13, Feb '14
Quote:
Originally Posted by csmith12 View Post
While your not totally incorrect, don't assume such things my good man. The general accepted rule for weight distro for pedal bikes would be that 30:70, but those figures do not transfer to road bikes 100%. From my research, a good starting point for a sport bike might be something more like 45/55, it mostly holds true to what most of us are riding these days. To finally reach the 50:50 goal... we must take the rider's weight into account.

From Ducati:
huh. Good find!

The engine throws me off from visually estimating a CG position, leaning forward and hugging the front wheel.
choneofakind is offline   Reply With Quote


Old April 27th, 2016, 02:09 PM   #44
Misti
ninjette.org sage
 
Misti's Avatar
 
Name: Misti
Location: Vancouver, BC
Join Date: Oct 2010

Motorcycle(s): currently: Yamaha YZF 250 dirt/motard

Posts: 787
From Twist of the Wrist II:

"Considering that most machines in a static or constant speed situation have a 50/50 weight distribution (+or -5.0 percent) front-to-rear, we begin to calculate the guidelines of correct acceleration through a turn. By the numbers we want to transfer 10 to 20 percent of the weight rearwards, using the throttle. Technically, this is 0.1 to 0.2 G of acceleration. Simply put, it's the force generated by a smooth fifth-gear roll-on in the 4000-6000rpm range on pretty much anything over 600cc. That's not much acceleration, but it does the job."

Traction Specifics:

"When we talk about cornering we are talking about traction as the rider's main concern. To determine an ideal scene for traction, machine-wise, we start by simply measuring the contact patches of the tires to discover what the basic distribution of loads should be while cornering. Roughly speaking, those measurements show that 40 percent of the total load should be up front, 60 percent at the rear. Bikes set up for racing and real GP machines carry more rear rubber, changing the useable load bias (possibly to as much as 70 percent on the rear) to favour hard acceleration coming out of turns. Each bike's exact ideal weight distribution may vary a bit from the basic 40/60 percent rule. The rider's task is to match the exact load specs of his machine with expert use of the throttle."
__________________________________________________
"Leap and the net will appear!"
superbikeschool.com
www.motomom.ca
Misti is offline   Reply With Quote


2 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
Old January 13th, 2024, 01:18 PM   #45
HighsideUK
newbie, but only here.
 
Name: Anthony
Location: UK
Join Date: Jan 2024

Motorcycle(s): EX250H (ZZR250, or the original "250 Ninja" for our American brethren), EX500D, ZX900C2 (old git)

Posts: 1
This is a very old post, but an interesting question.

I think the reason rear tyres are wider on race bikes is because you need a larger contact patch to exert more force (put down more power).
Despite the fact that brakes can easily be made more powerful than engines, the way back wheels on motorcycles lose traction is much easier to control than the way front ones do.
So we are much happier drifting the rear coming out of corners than scrubbing the front going in to them.
Or, more to the point, the racers are.
So we want our rear wheels to handle more power.
On cruisers, it is just convenient to have more weight, and so a bigger tyre, on the back.
Either way rear tyres are wider.

But, if you only consider the physics/mechanics/material science, then for getting into and around corners as quick as you can, the optimal weight distribution and contact patch is 50/50.
HighsideUK is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[motorcyclistonline] - Weight, Weight, Don’t Tell Me | Cranked Ninjette Newsbot Motorcycling News 0 July 17th, 2014 09:40 AM
weight of new gen 250 rear wheel? genosr1 Ninjettes At Speed 3 December 8th, 2013 05:53 PM
New foot pegs, handlebar weight, rear hanger & peg, etc. RaceBikeRentals Motorcycle-related 7 June 14th, 2012 09:25 AM
[hell for leather] - Husqvarna 900: power, weight and power-to-weight Ninjette Newsbot Motorcycling News 0 June 29th, 2011 09:20 PM
rear end cleanup / weight loss dbotos 1986 - 2007 Ninja 250R Farkles 12 January 6th, 2011 07:10 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Motorcycle Safety Foundation

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Website uptime monitoring Host-tracker.com
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Except where otherwise noted, all site contents are © Copyright 2022 ninjette.org, All rights reserved.